Inspect the source asset
Open the original file before making changes. For KIRI Engine scan, record its format, units, dependencies, and current non-manifold geometry so the topology diagnosis pass has a reliable baseline.
Plan topology diagnosis for KIRI Engine scan. Review the source, test the destination export, and document settings, evidence, and open risks.
Open the original file before making changes. For KIRI Engine scan, record its format, units, dependencies, and current non-manifold geometry so the topology diagnosis pass has a reliable baseline.
During topology diagnosis for KIRI Engine scan, establish the expected state of non-manifold geometry. Resolve or document any gap before moving on to density distribution.
Do not rely on the authoring viewport alone. For topology diagnosis, load a representative export in KIRI Engine scan and verify density distribution together with deformation flow.
For KIRI Engine scan, keep the accepted export, its settings, and a short note about unresolved risks. Name the person responsible for the final review of topology diagnosis.
Treat this as a focused delivery check: for KIRI Engine scan, begin with non-manifold geometry, then test density distribution and deformation flow in the actual destination. Keep the accepted export settings and any unresolved topology diagnosis risks with the source file.
KIRI Engine scan is a starting point, not proof that an asset is production-ready. A topology diagnosis pass should distinguish generation artifacts from deliberate form before anyone spends time polishing the result.
For KIRI Engine scan, keep the topology diagnosis pass focused on non-manifold geometry, density distribution, and deformation flow. Make one controlled change at a time and retain enough evidence for another person to repeat the decision.
Identify non-manifold edges, self-intersections, thin surfaces, poles, and density spikes before deciding whether retopology is necessary. Apply this topology diagnosis guidance to the actual KIRI Engine scan delivery path.
| topology diagnosis check for KIRI Engine scan | KIRI Engine scan pass condition for topology diagnosis | Evidence to keep for KIRI Engine scan topology diagnosis |
|---|---|---|
| non-manifold geometry during topology diagnosis for KIRI Engine scan | For KIRI Engine scan topology diagnosis, the source and revised asset use an agreed value for non-manifold geometry. | Keep KIRI Engine scan topology diagnosis before-and-after values and the setting that changed. |
| density distribution during topology diagnosis for KIRI Engine scan | The topology diagnosis result for density distribution matches the expected behavior in KIRI Engine scan, not only in the editor. | Keep target-side evidence for KIRI Engine scan topology diagnosis, such as an import log or captured test. |
| deformation flow during topology diagnosis for KIRI Engine scan | The recorded result for deformation flow meets the KIRI Engine scan release requirement for this topology diagnosis job. | Keep the accepted KIRI Engine scan result and the reviewer name for topology diagnosis. |
| repair scope after topology diagnosis for KIRI Engine scan | The topology diagnosis handoff for KIRI Engine scan contains only the files needed downstream. | Keep the KIRI Engine scan export preset, fallback, dependencies, and open risks from topology diagnosis. |
For KIRI Engine scan, define the asset, destination, and release condition before editing. Keep a clean source copy and state why non-manifold geometry is relevant to topology diagnosis.
For topology diagnosis in KIRI Engine scan, treat unresolved density distribution as blocking. Decide whether it needs a technical fix, additional evidence, or a qualified reviewer.
For topology diagnosis, require a representative result in KIRI Engine scan, the accepted export settings, and a clear outcome for deformation flow. Record who approved the final package.
During topology diagnosis, compare the source and destination values for non-manifold geometry. Do not continue until the difference is explained and assigned to the asset or the KIRI Engine scan pipeline.
For topology diagnosis, capture the KIRI Engine scan result and isolate the responsible layer. A clean authoring preview is not proof when the exported density distribution result no longer matches the baseline.
Define an observable topology diagnosis result or move the decision to a qualified KIRI Engine scan reviewer. Do not hide an unresolved deformation flow risk behind a general “ready” status.
For KIRI Engine scan, start with non-manifold geometry on the untouched source file. It gives you a baseline before the topology diagnosis pass changes geometry, materials, metadata, or export settings.
During topology diagnosis for KIRI Engine scan, record the source format, units, texture locations, material slots, exporter, destination version, and observed density distribution behavior.
The topology diagnosis pass is complete when non-manifold geometry, density distribution, and deformation flow have been tested in KIRI Engine scan, the export opens correctly, and remaining review has an owner.
For KIRI Engine scan, use a qualified reviewer during topology diagnosis when deformation flow cannot be verified automatically or when licensing, device, marketplace, or domain rules affect approval.